+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct leads with 9.5% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B was developed by NVIDIA through customization of Meta's Llama 3.1 70B, designed to enhance performance for specific use cases and deployments. Built with NVIDIA's optimizations and fine-tuning expertise, it demonstrates how foundation models can be adapted for specialized applications.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B was created as an efficient coding-specialized model, designed to bring strong programming capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built with 7 billion parameters optimized for code understanding and generation, it provides developers with a lightweight option for code-related tasks.
12 days newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:78.3%(+9.5%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Average Score:68.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:78.3%(+9.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Avg Score:68.8%
Providers:0