+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Mistral NeMo Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral NeMo Instruct leads with 2.7% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available on 2 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B was created as an efficient coding-specialized model, designed to bring strong programming capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built with 7 billion parameters optimized for code understanding and generation, it provides developers with a lightweight option for code-related tasks.
2 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:69.7%(+2.7%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Average Score:67.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Mistral AI
Throughput: 0.1 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:69.7%(+2.7%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Avg Score:67.0%
Providers:0