+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Phi 4 vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct leads with 8.7% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.0% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (84.8%), HumanEval+ (82.8%), HumanEval (82.6%). The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The model shows competitive results across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (88.4%), GSM8k (83.9%), MBPP (83.5%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 28 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:30.7%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Average Score:39.3%(+8.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput: 33 tok/s
Latency: 0.2ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:30.7%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Avg Score:39.3%(+8.7%)
Providers:0