+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads with 15.7% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B was created as an efficient coding-specialized model, designed to bring strong programming capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built with 7 billion parameters optimized for code understanding and generation, it provides developers with a lightweight option for code-related tasks.
5 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:81.0%(+15.7%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Average Score:65.2%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:81.0%(+15.7%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Avg Score:65.2%
Providers:0